The Stel Salaried Pensioners Organization wishes to thank The Hamilton Spectator for permission to post the following article by Reporters Naomi Powell and Joan Walters, published in the November 16, 2005 edition

 

Another $100m could seal Stelco deal

Bondholders want province to double cash

By Naomi Powell and Joan Walters
The Hamilton Spectator
(Nov 16, 2005)

Stelco's bondholders say it will take another $100 million from the provincial government to save the steelmaker.

A creditor vote on Stelco's restructuring plan was adjourned yesterday under threat of liquidation after Stelco CEO Courtney Pratt announced the company had not won the crucial support of its bondholders.

In a telephone call to Stelco's court-appointed monitor, Justice James Farley granted an adjournment to Nov. 21. But he warned that if the plan is voted down, he will interrupt his vacation to hear stakeholders' plans for "alternate relief" on Nov. 25.

Stelco's court-appointed monitor, Alex Morrison, has cautioned that liquidation is likely if creditors don't support the restructuring plan. Stelco's bondholders have final vote on the plan. For the first time, they said yesterday they'll back a plan that doubles the amount of taxpayer money going into the pension deficit. The deal now has the province putting $100 million into the pension and Stelco $300 million.

Ted Swent's retirement was supposed to start in three years.

Those plans have been put on hold, however, thanks to Stelco's long and tortuous path through bankruptcy protection. Swent was one of dozens of Stelco creditors who showed up at Mississauga's International Centre yesterday for a day that was long on frustration and disappointment and short on answers.

They were there to vote on Stelco's proposed restructuring plan but the vote was adjourned until Monday after the company announced that it was still hopeful a deal could be reached with its major bondholders.

Swent, 62, is the owner of A. Swent and Sons Ltd., a Selkirk metal fabrication business that is owed $250,000 by Stelco.

"We're only 25 people in my company, so that's a lot (of money)," said Swent. "It's been very hard on us the last year and a half."

Swent said he's had to postpone his retirement and dip into his retirement savings because of the hardship his company has faced from Stelco's unpaid debt. In March, Swent said he was approached by New York's Longacre Management LLC about buying his debt.

At first they offered him 54 cents for every dollar of debt he held. Eventually, Longacre escalated the offer to 92 cents on the dollar, but insisted on subtracting a 20 per cent "holdback" fee in case the debt was contested by the company.

"If they'd given me dollar for dollar I would have taken it," Swent added.

Also present at yesterday's meeting were some of Stelco's "other" bondholders.

These people are a world away from the investment companies and corporate high flyers that have the ability to direct the steelmaker's future by virtue of their power and the size of their holdings.

There's Rodger Archer of Markham, for example, a retired management consultant and self-described "little guy in this process." Archer bought a $10,000 Stelco bond from the company six years ago as part of his retirement portfolio and hung on to it ever since.

"I'm a believer in Stelco and the industry," said Archer outside the meeting hall.

Archer was prepared to vote against the restructuring plan because he's convinced there's still a much better offer to come. He's even hopeful that he can recoup 100 per cent of the value of his investment.

"I honestly think that's achievable."

Also in the audience were a number of Stelco's smaller creditors, such as Chris Golding of Guelph, who operates Crosible Filtration which he says is owed "in excess of $35,000 US."

Golding was prepared to vote in favour of Stelco's plan, although he admitted it was difficult for him to digest all of the complexities of the company's intricate proposal to creditors.

By his reckoning, a vote in favour would get him 66 cents on the dollar in Stelco equity versus the possibility of 17 cents on the dollar in cash if the plan was defeated and the company was eventually liquidated.

"I'd rather have 66 cents and the possibility that the value of my stock might eventually go up," said Golding.

Less optimistic is Robert Plaschka of Burlington, a trade creditor who provided electrical engineering and consulting services to Stelco. Before seeking bankruptcy protection, the steelmaker represented half to almost three-quarters of the work for Plaschka.

But warning bells started going off for Plaschka when his invoices weren't getting paid on time, falling from 30 days past due to 45 days to eventually 90 days. His final two invoices went unpaid, leaving him owed $6,000.

"It was rough because they were a big part of my business," he said. "Essentially, I've pretty much written them off. Anything now would be a bonus."

Plaschka said he showed up at the meeting as part of an ongoing, painful education process for himself.

"I've learned a few lessons," he said, managing a small smile. "Don't put all your eggs in one basket, don't put all your eggs in one industry and diversify."

sbuist@thespec.com

905-526-3226

With files from Naomi Powell, The Hamilton Spectator