The Stel Salaried Pensioners Organization wishes to thank The Hamilton Spectator for permission to post the following article by Reporter Steve Arnold published in the October 24, 2005 edition

 

Union says analyst has wrong take on Stelco

New debt can be paid in shares, not cash

By Steve Arnold
The Hamilton Spectator
(Oct 24, 2005)

Supporters of Stelco's controversial restructuring plan are rejecting a warning it could leave the company vulnerable to future financial trouble.

In a recent industry newsletter, New York-based analyst Mike Locker warned the refinancing plan Stelco is trying to get its creditors to approve will leave it with more than $1.2 billion in debt and a cost disadvantage of up to $50 US per ton compared to competitors.

"With the recent announcement of a restructuring plan, there finally appears to be a light at the end of the seemingly infinite Stelco bankruptcy tunnel," Locker wrote. "However, it remains unclear that the newly proposed plan provides the long-term fix that Stelco and its employees will need to weather the next down cycle."

Specifically, Locker worries the interest payments on Stelco's restructured debt and the annual contributions of up to $70 million to pay down the pension deficit would be more than the company's cash flow could handle.

"Given Stelco's continued cost disadvantage and the substantial debt load, it is unlikely that the mill will be able to survive the next downturn without another visit to (bankruptcy protection)," he wrote.

Locker was an adviser to the union during an earlier Stelco financing round, but the relationship ended over what union leader Bill Ferguson calls "irreconcilable differences" over how pension and retirement benefits should be handled in restructuring.

Now, Ferguson said, Locker is echoing company arguments from the start of the restructuring -- that the cost of pensions and health benefits for retirees were driving it out of business. Those arguments weren't true then and still aren't.

"He's saying that the cost of post-retirement benefits will cause the company to have extreme debt," Ferguson said. "That's why we severed our relationship, over those kinds of irreconcilable differences."

Union leader Scott Duvall also sees weaknesses in Locker's position.

"I don't think he really understands the full plan, that we're all going to restructure," he said. "I don't think he really knows what's in the actual agreements.

"I don't understand why he's saying any deal without concessions puts Stelco at a disadvantage. If we make the right changes in the restructuring, there's no need for us to take concessions because the company can get what it needs through productivity."

Lawyer Murray Gold, who represents Stelco's salaried retirees, said Locker's analysis misses the critical point that much of the new debt the company will take on under its restructuring plan can be paid off with shares rather than cash.

"There are some very good protections for the company built into this plan," Gold said. "A lot of the debt can be converted or the interest can be paid in shares. That will save a lot of cash for the company."

Under the Stelco plan, to be financed with money from Tricap Management Inc. and the provincial government, the company will take on $950 million in revolving lines of credit and issue $550 million in notes which can be converted to common shares. Tricap will also underwrite a $75-million rights offering with the option of buying another $25 million worth. A $100-million note would be issued to the province in exchange for its $100-million loan toward a pension deficit down payment.

sarnold@thespec.com

905-526-3496