The Stel Salaried Pensioners Organization wishes to thank The Hamilton Spectator for permission to post the following Editorial by Mark McNeil published in the October 5, 2005 edition

 

1005 obstinance doesn't help

By Mark McNeil
The Hamilton Spectator
(Oct 5, 2005)

Over the nagging months of Stelco's bankruptcy protection, people in Hamilton have been through moments of hope, stretches of despair and the numbing torture of wondering whether the process will ever end.

But through it all, one key player has stood out as a frustrating impediment to a successful conclusion -- United Steelworkers Local 1005.

Unlike other union locals that have fully participated, 1005 president Rolf Gerstenberger and his supporters believe that refusing to take part will keep members from giving up concessions in their contract, which expires next summer.

But a contract can become of little value if the company is forced into bankruptcy. So it has always been in the interest of the union to have a hand in drafting a survival plan.

Gerstenberger's duty to his local members is better served by engagement than estrangement. It is unwise and unproductive to hold onto the collective agreement like some kind of flotation device in a stormy ocean.

What makes this even more troubling is 1005's most recent decision to reject Stelco's restructuring deal on grounds that it supposedly poses "enormous risks."

Sharon White, a lawyer for Local 1005, told court on Monday that the company's strategy to emerge from bankruptcy protection does not address the core problems Stelco faces and leaves it with too much debt.

Justice James Farley then quipped: "I'll look forward to 1005's proposal for the company's salvation. I've got the stones, why don't you start building as opposed to throwing."

The judge's words go to the heart of the matter, despite Gerstenberger's assertion that Farley's comments were "very inappropriate ... We're the ones who make the steel so we're building everything ... We had legitimate concerns to raise. It's far from casting stones.''

Fortunately, Farley did not let the 1005 recalcitrance -- or bondholder non-acceptance, which is another big problem -- stand in the way of pushing the process further. Yesterday, he agreed to extend bankruptcy protection until Dec. 5, and he approved Stelco's deal with Tricap Management as the basis for a final deal.

It is hoped that all stakeholders -- no matter who they represent -- work constructively in the weeks ahead to develop the Tricap deal into final settlement.

Local 1005 needs to be an active participant, making a positive contribution, because throwing stones solves nothing.