The Stel Salaried Pensioners Organization wishes to thank The Hamilton Spectator for permission to post the following article by Reporter Steve Arnold published in the May 4, 2005 edition

 

Failed suitor targets Stelco

By Steve Arnold
The Hamilton Spectator
(May 4, 2005)

One of Stelco Inc.'s rejected suitors is making another run at the troubled steel giant.

A partnership of Sherritt International and the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan wants to revive its $1.8-billion plan to refinance the Hamilton steel giant.

In court documents filed yesterday, Island Energy Partnership, a joint venture between the mining company and one of Canada's largest pension plans, asked for court permission to file and publicize "substantially the same" plan Stelco rejected in March.

The steelmaker turned down that and other offers, saying none met the company's objectives.

It said no to a substantially lower refinancing offer from Brascan Corporation last month before agreeing to review it just before a court hearing.

There's nothing to suggest that Stelco has changed its position on the Sherritt proposal. And it's not clear if the company will entertain it.

Stelco spokesman Helen Reeves said the company hadn't reviewed Sherritt's court documents and declined to comment further.

Sherritt's renewed interest in Stelco brings to three the number of bids offering to refinance the company. Tricap Management Ltd., the restructuring unit of Brascan Corporation, has offered a $1.35-billion rescue package that includes $500 million toward Stelco's pension deficit. The company's bondholders have also submitted a plan to the board of directors, but no details have been made public.

In court documents, Sherritt argues its plan "is superior to the proposal contained in the Tricap Letter of Intent and better protects the interests of Stelco and its stakeholders." But under the confidentiality agreement Sherritt signed last year it can't illustrate the differences. Its legal motion asks for permission to file its plan and to discuss the details with Stelco's stakeholders.

Sherritt vice-president for investor relations Deanna Horton said she couldn't discuss anything in the offer because of the confidentiality agreement.

Guy Bentinck, Sherritt's senior vice-president and chief financial officer, argued in an affidavit that his company's plan "would provide Stelco and its employees with a more stable foundation for growth and would make Stelco a revitalized organization with a focused strategic plan and a stronger financial position than is possible under any other alternative. It would provide Stelco with the required capital to emerge from CCAA as a Canadian public company with a strong balance sheet and sound operating fundamentals."

While the prospect of a brewing bidding war for Stelco was welcome news to some of the people who depend on the company, others wondered what Sherritt intends for Stelco.

Sherritt, directly and through its subsidiaries, produces thermal coal, nickel and cobalt. It has interests in oil and gas exploration, development and production and electricity generation. When its offer was tabled during Stelco's first capital-raising process, Sherritt representatives admitted they were more interested in Stelco as an energy producer than as a steel maker.

That left some critics wondering how much of the $1.8-billion refinancing was new money to solve Stelco's pension and cost-of-production problems and how much was intended to buy existing assets such as the coke ovens.

For Mike Locker, New York-based financial adviser to the United Steelworkers of America, that's not much to worry about -- the heat from steel making is the key to producing the energy the partnership hopes to sell.

"Sherritt isn't primarily interested in the steelmaking operations, but you can't do the energy without the steel mill running," he said.

"This could amount to a very good offer," Locker added. "They have a track record of doing creative things with assets, including employees."

Rob Moffatt, spokesman for the salaried employee's association, said another offer to revive the company shows there's still value in Stelco.

"It's very good news that companies are interested because it speaks to the strengths that we still have," he said. "It's always a good thing when an interested party comes forward. It puts pressure on the company to do the right thing."

Union leader Bill Ferguson was cautious about the offer -- he said he's willing to talk to any potential investor but wanted more detail before endorsing the proposal.

"This came right out of the blue and we don't know what they're really offering," he said.

Key elements of the Sherritt-Teachers' plan unveiled last year include:

* Acquisition of noncore utilities assets such as coke batteries, materials-handling facilities and boilers;

* Commitment to expand Lake Erie's coke battery by 500,000 tonnes and construct new co-generation facilities at Lake Erie and Hamilton;

* Underwriting of an equity rights issue to existing shareholders and subscription for new equity, a portion of which will be made available to the union, employees, and creditors;

* Fixed and revolving debt facilities.

Yesterday Sherritt reported first quarter profits of $35.5 million on revenue of $255.3 million, down from $46.1 million on $258.5 million last year. The lower earnings were blamed on lower cobalt prices and higher income taxes.

sarnold@thespec.com

905-526-3496